How America’s Elections Are Hacked, Missing Link Discovered Vote fraud expert Bev Harris exposes electronic voting machines – October 31, 2016

Black Box Voting, founded in 2003, performs nonpartisan investigative reporting on elections in an attempt to stop vote rigging.
You may be wondering what the term “black box” means. A “black box” system is non-transparent; its functions are hidden from the public. Elections, of course, should not be black box systems.
Here is a link to a free copy of the book, Black Box Voting HERE.
Author Bev Harris became known for groundbreaking work on electronic voting machines, which can remove transparency of the vote count.
With voting machines, all political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors:

Hillary To Be Indicted After Election: Trump Responds To FBI Investigation

Published on Oct 28, 2016
The FBI on Friday announced it is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, another shocking October surprise for the Democrat candidate days from the presidential election.
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family:

Who Was Behind the 2008 Financial Crash? US Aristocracy’s Immunity From Prosecution. Proposal to Hold Top Level Wall Street “Crooks” Accountable

By Eric Zuesse
Global Research, October 27, 2016

For the very first time, on October 25th, a high federal official, the “SIGTARP” or Special Inspector General for the TARP program that bailed out the largest financial institutions and their top investors after the 2008 economic crash, is now making a specific proposal to hold the top-level crooks accountable for the incentive-systems they had put into place motivating their employees to pump-and-dump ‘investments’ during the growth-phase of the ‘free market’ Ponzi game that existed since 2000 when the end of the FDR-era Glass-Steagall Act and the start of totally unregulated financial marketeering went wild after 2005 and came crashing down in 2008.
Despite the deregulation that Bill Clinton and George W. Bush (and both political parties in Congress) instituted, there still remained on the books some laws that high financial executives were breaking, but the SIGTARP has now come to an impasse in trying to obtain the evidence that will enable investigations to proceed against the top executives, and so she is coming out to urge cooperation of the rest of the government in order to enable it to happen. The SIGTARP, Christy Goldsmith Romero, urges:
I propose that Congress remove the insulation around Wall Street CEOs and other high-level officials by requiring the CEO, CFO and certain other senior executives to sign an annual certification that they have conducted due diligence within their organization and can certify that that there is no criminal conduct or civil fraud in their organization.
According to a Reuters report from Patrick Rucker, titled “Wall St. Rescue Fund Watchdog Says U.S. Bank Heads Too Insulated”, “Wall Street executives are too shielded from prosecution and should answer for misdeeds committed by underlings, the watchdog for a multibillion-dollar [federal-government] bailout [of the mega-banks] said on Wednesday.” This article, dated Wednesday October 25th, continued: “Senior banking officials should attest each year that their companies are free of criminal fraud and civil abuse, said Christy Goldsmith Romero, special inspector general of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. ‘Every executive should be able to conduct due diligence,’ she told Reuters in an interview. ‘If they are too big to do that, then they are too big, period.’”
That policy, if honestly placed into practice, would likely result in lengthy prison terms for many of the people who are the big-dollar political donors; and so it can’t possibly happen. But the very fact that someone in a federal-government capacity has finally said publicly that it needs to happen is shocking enough.
The article continues:
“U.S. taxpayers have invested more than $400 billion since the crisis, mostly in large Wall Street banks. Goldsmith Romero leads a staff of roughly 140 investigators examining possible abuse of the TARP program.”
Romero on Wednesday sent to Congress her agency’s 550-page investigative report (not linked-to by Reuters but here) on that subject, and Rucker continued: ”Goldsmith Romero said the report also described cases where executives are complicit in fraud but the highest-ranking officials are walled off. ‘The knowledge stops,’ she said. ‘It resides at lower levels and stops there. And in many cases, I think that’s by intentional design.’”
The reporter, Mr. Rucker, makes clear how grave this situation really is:
“Goldsmith Romero has never before suggested a reform of the financial system. She said that she felt compelled to speak up this time after facing so many cases where senior executives seemed out of reach from prosecutions.”
So: although the aristocrats’ immunity will not be removed, a federal official has now had the courage to state that it must be removed.
Elizabeth Warren, a U.S. Senator who held off from making any endorsement during the Presidential primaries, is now campaigning for Hillary Clinton to become President — the same candidate that Wall Street executives are overwhelmingly funding to win the Presidency — but Warren is already verbally supportive of what Romero is urging. On September 15th, David Dayen at The Intercept bannered, “Elizabeth Warren Asks Newly Chatty FBI Director to Explain Why DOJ Didn’t Prosecute Banksters”, and he reported that on that day:
“Warren released two highly provocative letters demanding some explanations. One is to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, requesting a review of how federal law enforcement managed to whiff on all 11 substantive criminal referrals submitted by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC), a panel set up to examine the causes of the 2008 meltdown. The other is to FBI Director James Comey, asking him to release all FBI investigations and deliberations related to those referrals.”
Warren’s campaigning for Clinton, who has always been against accountability at the top in the U.S., is drastically inconsistent with this public display of supporting such accountability, and is therefore untrustworthy.
I (who until now had always voted only for Democrats) earlier reported the fundamental dishonesty of the Democratic Party’s elite about precisely this matter.

Privately, Obama had told Wall Street executives that he would protect them. On 27 March 2009, Obama assembled the top executives of the bailed-out financial firms in a secret meeting at the White House and he assured them that he would cover their backs; he promised “My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks”. It’s not on the White House website; it was leaked out, which is one of the reasons Obama hates leakers (including such heroes as Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, and Julian Assange). What the DOJ’s IG indicated was, in effect, that Obama had kept his secret promise to them.
Here is the context in which Obama said that (from page 234 of Ron Suskind’s 2011 book, Confidence Men):
The CEOs went into their traditional stance. “It’s almost impossible to set caps [to their bonuses]; it’s never worked, and you lose your best people,” said one. “We’re competing for talent on an international market,” said another. Obama cut them off.
“Be careful how you make those statements, gentlemen. The public isn’t buying that,” he said. “My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.”
It was an attention grabber, no doubt, especially that carefully chosen last word.
But then Obama’s flat tone turned to one of support, even sympathy. “You guys have an acute public relations problem that’s turning into a political problem,” he said. “And I want to help. But you need to show that you get that this is a crisis and that everyone has to make some sacrifices.” According to one of the participants, he then said, “I’m not out there to go after you. I’m protecting you. But if I’m going to shield you from public and congressional anger, you have to give me something to work with on these issues of compensation.”
No suggestions were forthcoming from the bankers on what they might offer, and the president didn’t seem to be championing any specific proposals. He had none: neither Geithner nor Summers believed compensation controls had any merit.
After a moment, the tension in the room seemed to lift: the bankers realized he was talking about voluntary limits on compensation until the storm of public anger passed. It would be for show.
He had been lying to the public, all along. Not only would he not prosecute the banksters, but he would treat them as if all they had was “an acute public relations problem that’s turning into a political problem.” And he thought that the people who wanted them prosecuted were like the KKK who had chased Blacks with pitchforks before lynching. According to the DOJ, their Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force (FFETF) was “established by President Barack Obama in November 2009 to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.” But, according to the Department’s IG, it was all a fraud: a fraud that according to the DOJ itself had been going on since at least November 2009.

If this matter that Romero is raising will be coming up during a Hillary Clinton Administration, the lying about it will simply continue, that’s all. Barack Obama is no less vicious a liar than Hillary Clinton is, but she’s not nearly as skillful a deceiver as he is, but that’s the only real difference between them. She’ll get the job done for the political megadonors, just the same, like she always has.
However, if Donald Trump is to be President, then no one can intelligently say what his policy on accountability would be — other than that he’ll work with Congress to get an independent prosecutor to investigate the criminal allegations against Hillary Clinton, including the ones that the untrustworthy FBI alleges that it has already investigated in an impartial manner. Regarding the specific issue that Romero is implicitly also urging, the reinstatement of the FDR-era Glass-Steagall Act, which Bill Clinton and the Republicans terminated in 2000 and which had limited bank-size, Trump is on record as demanding that it be done. (That’s one of the reasons why he has been receiving far less from Wall Street than Hillary Clinton has been. Wall Street loathes Trump. Almost everything in this ‘election’ is nearly the opposite of what is commonly presumed.)
For the first time in recent memory, there really is an important difference between the two major-Party Presidential candidates. The last time it happened was 2000, when the far-right candidate, George W. Bush ‘won’. This time around, it seems likely to be repeated (and maybe this time by a landslide): the far-right candidate Hillary Clinton will probably win — same result, just different nominal parties this time around. In an important sense, this year’s George W. Bush is Hillary Clinton. (He demanded regime-change in Iraq; she demands regime-change in Russia.) This year’s Al Gore is Donald Trump. Except that this time the big issue isn’t global warming, but instead nuclear war against Russia. Of course, GW Bush was bad on both issues (denying climate-change, and demanding “regime-change in Iraq” where the Moscow-friendly dictator Saddam Hussein ruled). But so too is Hillary (who followed up her ardent advocacy for regime-change in Iraq, by regime-change in Moscow-friendly Libya, and regime-change in Moscow-friendly Ukraine, and regime-change in Moscow-allied Syria; and who is now pushing for regime-change in Russia itself, and thus unchallenged U.S.-aristocracy control over every other nation’s aristocracy).
All of this election-year, the supposedly big issue was bigotry, but the thing that’s actually destroying this country and the entire world is class — rich versus poor; the super-rich crushing everyone else — and the ‘news’ media are controlled not by the many poor but by the very few super-rich. And this is why Romero’s call for justice is, sadly, just a cry into the wind.
Regarding politics, one has no reason to trust what one hears from the politicians,  reads in the newspapers and magazines, or hears or sees on radio and TV. The elite scams are overwhelming from all of the Establishment sides. But finally, an obscure federal official, Ms. Romero, the SIGTARP, has spoken her conscience, despite knowing that she’ll only be punished for it once she’s out of office. Unlike the Democratic Party politicians, she’s not grandstanding. She’s instead truly heroic, speaking truth to power, and really meaning it — and ready to face the consequences for having done it.
It’s remarkable. It’s Quixotic, in a really heroic way: pathbreaking, even if that path leads only to a brick wall. At least it will expose to the public the extent to which the system itself is their enemy. Not Mexicans. Not Blacks. Not Whites. Not Muslims. Not Christians. Not Jews. Not Russians. Not men. Not women. Not even (though bigots are dangerous fools) bigots against any such group. The system, right here in the U.S., needs to be changed. Nothing can authentically be blamed on any “not us” target — either for invasion, or otherwise.
Romero wants to cancel the immunity of aristocrats — the people who control this country.
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Eric Zuesse, Global Research, 2016

MONOPOLY: Banks, Then Media, Now Voting Machine Companies

Published on Oct 27, 2016
We’ve all seen what happened when the banks became too big to fail, too big to jail after Bill Clinton’s administration began a wave of bank consolidations. Now internet providers and content providers are proposing to consolidate in a way that will result in even more information control & privacy concerns. And under the radar, the electronic voting machine companies are rapidly consolidating as well, with one company supplying over 50% of US voting machines. And all the players pay the Clintons to play.

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family:

FALSE FLAG RED ALERT: Media plotting with Clinton operatives to gun down democrats and blame it on Trump

Sunday, October 23, 2016
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) As Dave Hodges has correctly pointed out in this article: both the New York Times and Washington Post have been interviewing pro-Trump supporters who are warning readers about the possibility of an armed citizens’ revolt if Hillary Clinton steals the White House.

I was interviewed last week by a Washington Post reporter, whom I told flat out that “your newspaper has zero credibility” and that whatever I gave them on the record would likely be twisted and selectively edited to fit their desired narrative. That’s why I recorded my entire interview with their reporter, who turned out to be rather polite and genuinely concerned about one of my predictions. To his credit, if he actually writes and publishes an honest story rather than a propaganda piece, I will make note of it.

Why did he call me in the first place? My widely-shared article predicting leftists bombings of government buildings was published several days before the GOP headquarters in North Carolina was firebombed by violent leftists. In my original story entitled:

VOTERS WARNED: You’ve already lost America… this election is about taking it back in the last non-violent way possible:

I wrote, “As all this is going down, you should fully expect violent, extremist leftist to be setting bombs all over the place, with funding for the bombs coming from George Soros, the key funding source of domestic terrorism in America.”

Just a few days later, the bombings began in North Carolina, confirming one of my predictions and possibly giving my article the credibility that might cause mainstream media reporters to be concerned about what else I’ve been predicting. (Note to reporters: Yes, you should read my predictions if you really want to know U.S. history before it happens…)

Those additional predictions, by the way, include one possible scenario where armed Americans march on Washington and occupy the White House, resulting in the kind of bloodshed and violence we all hope can be avoided in any civilized nation. My article called on Americans to avoid this scenario by taking back their country at the ballot box, thus reestablishing the balance of power at the ballot box.

Yet, ironically, it is the mainstream media that is playing a monumental role in making sure America’s elections are no longer open, free and fair. The media’s radically one-sided promotion of Hillary Clinton coupled with extremely biased attacks on Donald Trump only confirm to tens of millions of Americans that the system is entirely rigged against them. Had the media engaged in something resembling balanced coverage of the candidates, I doubt there would be much of the sense of anger, frustration and incredulity that’s now reflected across much of the voting population.

The leftist media, in other words, is at least partly to blame for the extreme political polarization now being witnessed across America. And that’s directly because the media has now chosen sides… and the side they’ve chosen is the side that despises almost everything America was founded on.

Gunning down democrats to blame Trump supporters
ANALYSIS: It’s now clear that the same leftist media which has systematically rigged everything — staged debate questions, staged polls, rehearsed audience comments at CNN, deep collusion with the Clinton campaign, total censorship of Wikileaks emails, etc. — is colluding with Clinton-linked terror operatives who are going to commit acts of mass violence that will be blamed on Trump supporters.

It’s a repeat of the exact same Trump rally violence that’s been caught on video by Project Veritas (, where democrat operatives openly admit they take money from the Clinton campaign to stage and carry out acts of extreme violence so they can be blamed on Trump.

Now, I fear, they are taking that false flag operation to a whole new level. It’s now obvious to me, after talking with the Washington Post reporter, that leftists operatives are going to pretend to be Trump supporters and then open fire on crowds of Clinton supporters using automatic weapons. Leftist propaganda rags like the NYT, Boston Globe and WashPost are readying their articles to blame Trump supporters such as myself, Dave Hodges and Alex Jones, declaring us guilty of using “inflammatory rhetoric” any time we discuss the proper role of the Second Amendment in defending democracy against criminal government regimes.

This is all being orchestrated in advance… scripted like everything else coming out of the (fake) leftist media. It may even involve a staged false flag attack at an actual Clinton rally where CNN cameras will be sure to cover the bloody mayhem. The anti-Trump narrative will be unleashed within minutes, consisting of a barrage of queued stories and the universal condemnation of Donald Trump who will be accused of “signaling” his supporters to carry out the act that was actually carried out by paid terrorists working for the democrats.

The Rest Of The Story Here

Trump’s ‘Gettysburg address’ makes closing argument for choosing him and unveils first-100-days agenda as he promises ‘the kind of change that only arrives once in a lifetime’

‘First 100 days’ agenda speech formalized his mainstay political pledges with promises of legislation and executive orders
Called it a ‘Contract with the American Voter,’ modeling it after the 1994 Republican ‘Contract with America’
Trump touted ‘the kind of change that only arrives once in a lifetime’ and made his final substantive pitch to frame the campaign’s last two weeks
Told an audience of about 300 invited guests that he will ‘drain the swamp’ in Washington
Borrowed a line from Abraham Lincoln’s 1863 speech, saying he would replace D.C. elites ‘with a new government of, by and for the people.’ 
A Trump aide said the Civil War battlefield site is appropriate because ‘Gettysburg was the moment when the war turned’
The candidate briefly visited the site of the famed Civil War battle after his speech 

By David Martosko, Us Political Editor For In Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
Published: 23:56 EST, 21 October 2016 | Updated: 13:27 EST, 22 October 2016

Donald Trump planted a flag on hallowed ground Saturday morning by laying out near the Gettysburg National Battlefield what he would do in his first 100 days as President of the United States.
Touting ‘the kind of change that only arrives once in a lifetime,’ Trump told an audience of about 300 invited guests that he will ‘drain the swamp’ in Washington, replacing the current government ‘with a new government of, by and for the people.’
The symbolism factor was high, with a campaign aide telling reporters Friday night that the Civil War battle in Gettysburg memorialized by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863 ‘was the moment when the war turned.’
The Republican nominee left the podium and made a beeline in his motorcade for the National Military Park – the battlefield memorial – spending about as much time there as it took Lincoln to speak his 272 words.
Trump’s own war – a two-front clash against both Hillary Clinton and the mass media – will come to a climax on November 8 when most Americans will choose a leader for the next four years.
He summed up the substance of his campaign in a ‘Contract With The American Voter’ – a point-by-point set of initiatives that track with the themes he has focused on for 16 months.

‘It is a contract between myself and the American voter, and begins with restoring honesty, accountability and change to Washington,’ Trump said.
Included are six anti-corruption pledges, seven actions related to jobs and trade and five on immigration and the ‘rule of law.’ He ended his contract with a list of 10 bills he said he would try to quickly shepherd through Congress. 
Aides promised the Republican nominee would put more meat on the bare bones of some of his mainstay pledges, but little in the speech broke new ground.

Instead, Trump formalized his signature pledges by announcing a legislative package that he said he would help shepherd through Congress.

1. Constitutional Amendment to impose term limits on members of Congress 
2. Hiring freeze on federal employees to reduce the workforce through attrition 
3. Requirement to eliminate two federal regulations for every new one 
4. Five-year-ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists 
5. Lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying for foreign governments 
6. Complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections 
He also reiterated a laundry list of executive actions that he has sketched out in speeches stretching back more than a year. 
The small crowd gathered in a hotel ballroom was a far cry from the 10,000 rowdy fans he typically draws, but they brought moments of enthusiasm.
The audience rose to their feet and chanted ‘Trump! Trump! Trump!’ as he entered. One man shouted: ‘We love you!’
And in a sign of how deeply the GOP’s most negative campaign slogan has taken root, half the crowd chanted ‘Lock her up!’ at the first mention of Hillary Clinton’s name.
Trump reinforced his improbable but now undeniable populist bona fides, casting Clinton as the embodiment of a corrupt political establishment that’s willing to throw the middle class under bus the day after Americans vote.
‘Hillary Clinton is running against all of the American people, and all of the American voters,’ he said.
The billionaire real estate tycoon minced no words about his fears that rampant voter fraud could cost him and other Republicans a fair shot at winning 17 days from now. 
Citing Pew Research Center numbers, he said that ‘1.8 million dead people are registered to vote.’
‘And some of them are voting. I wonder how that happens!’ 
He also referred to 2.8 million people who are ‘registered in more than one state’ and said that ’14 per cent of non-citizens are registered to vote.’

Saturday’s two loudest applause lines were Trump’s pledge to repeal and replace the Obamacare medical insurance law and to end federal funding for ‘sanctuary cities’ – Democrat-run municipalities that offer safe harbor to illegal immigrants.
Saturday marked the second time Trump has engaged in the customary ‘first 100 days’ routine: In June he tacked a laundry list on to a speech castigating the Clintons for profiting from a ‘special interest monopoly’ in Washington.

1. Cancel Obama’s ‘unconstitutional’ executive actions, memoranda and orders
2. Pick a conservative replacement for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia 
3. Cancel all federal funding to ‘sanctuary cities’ that harbor illegal immigrants
4. Begin removing the 2 million criminal illegal immigrants from the U.S., and cancel visas to countries that won’t repatriate them 
5. Suspend immigration from terror-prone regions where incoming people can’t be properly vetted.
That set of promises was predictably vague, including pledges to ‘appoint judges who will uphold the Constitution,’ ‘stand up to countries that cheat on trade’ and ‘pass massive tax reform to create millions of new jobs.’ 
But on Saturday, for instance, those vagaries were supplemented by some concrete initiatives.
His famed wall on the U.S. border got a budget line-item with a proposed piece of legislation that will fund its construction – ‘with the full understanding that the country of Mexico will be reimbursing the United States.’
Trump’s light overtures on tax reform were ornamented with a few new numbers: a 35 per cent tax cut for middle-class families with two children, and a reduced 10 per cent rate for American companies that bring overseas money back home.
Before rattling off his policy to-do list, Trump aired more grievances against the journalism profession and the parade of women who have accused him of unwanted kissing and groping years – and in some cases decades – ago.
He said after the election, he plans to sue them.
‘Every woman lied when they came forward to hurt my campaign. Total fabrication. The events never happened. Never,’ Trump declared. 
‘All of these liars will be sued after the election is over.’
He also said he would litigate against the Democratic Party for allegedly paying saboteurs to start fistfights at his campaign rallies. 

1. Renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement or withdraw from it 
2. Withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
3. Order the secretary of the treasury to label China a ‘currency manipulator’ 
4. Use U.S. and international laws to end foreign trading abuses that unfairly impact American workers
5. Lift restrictions on the production of $50 trillion dollars’ worth of U.S. energy reserves including shale, oil, natural gas and coal
6. Approve the Keystone XL pipeline project and other ‘vital energy infrastructure projects’ 
7. Cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use the money to improve U.S. water and environmental infrastructure
On Saturday he enlisted two advisers to tee him up.
Retired Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg delivered the first pre-speech warmup, a somber seven-minute note of reverence on what Trump hopes will be remembered as the day his battle with America’s establishment had a rebirth.
‘I can’t think of a more historic place,’ Kellogg said.
‘It’s really a historic time in our life,’ he added as he drew parallels that stretch backward 153 years to a similar ‘time when the future of our nation was in doubt.’
‘We are waging another battle – a political one,’ he said.
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani framed the day in more practical terms, quoting Lincoln’s famous three-minute speech.
‘I don’t know if I could call government, right now, “of the people, by the people and for the people”,’ Giuliani said.
‘I think it’s government of the lobbyists, permanent politicians … the big gigantic multinational corporations, and the unions that can donate massive amounts of money.’
‘People are somewhere down there – somewhere,’ he lamented.

1. ‘Middle Class Tax Relief And Simplification Act’: Economic plan designed to grow the economy 4 per cent per year and create 25 million new jobs. Involves tax cuts, trade reform, regulatory relief, lifting restrictions on energy production, and encouraging companies with offshore funds to bring them back to America.
2. ‘End The Offshoring Act’: New tariffs on goods brought into the U.S. by American companies that relocate jobs outside the U.S.
3. ‘American Energy & Infrastructure Act’: Uses public-private partnerships and tax incentives to generate $1 trillion in infrastructure investment over 10 years
4. ‘School Choice And Education Opportunity Act’: Redirects education dollars to allow parents to choose any public, private, charter, magnet, religious or home school; ends the ‘Common Core’ federal standards; and expands vocational and technical education
5. ‘Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act’: Replaces the Affordable Care Act with health savings accounts, removes barriers to purchasing health insurance across state lines, allows states to manage Medicaid funds and speeds up drug approval inside the Food and Drug Administration
6. ‘Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act’: Provides tax deductions for childcare and elder care and incentivizes employers to provide on-site childcare services
7. ‘End Illegal Immigration Act’: Funds a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border, ‘with the full understanding that the country of Mexico will be reimbursing the United States’; establishes 2-year mandatory minimum federal prison sentence for illegally re-entering the U.S. after deportation, 5-year mandatory minimum for felons who illegally re-enter, and 5 years for coming back after multiple deportations; increases penalties for overstaying visas
8. ‘Restoring Community Safety Act’: Creates a Task Force On Violent Crime, increases federal funding of police forces and boosts federal support for anti-gang prosecutions
9. ‘Restoring National Security Act’: Eliminates the federal defense ‘sequester’ to restore military funding, guarantees veterans the option of private health care if VA facility wait times are long, institutes new defenses against cyber-attacks, and establishes new immigration screening based on ‘values’
10. ‘Clean up Corruption in Washington Act’: Enacts new ethics reforms affecting politicians and their staffers

The policy agenda Trump described, a senior campaign aide said Friday night, was far beyond what Democrat Hillary Clinton could put on the table.
She can’t articulate her policy goals, the aide said, because her donors haven’t yet told her what to think.
‘Secretary Clinton has no core,’ the aide charged during a conference call, quoting a Democratic aide in a hacked email recently released by WikiLeaks.
‘Her policies are determined by the checks that are given to her, and nothing else. And of course no one actually disagrees with that. Everyone understands that she’s a special-interest-driven candidate.’
The aide described Saturday’s event as ‘our chance to lay out a positive vision for the country, from Mr. Trump, about what he’s going to do in his first 100 days in office, and how he’s going to go about doing it.’ 

Dear Mainstream Media


Published on Oct 19, 2016
In today's broadcast, Christopher Greene of AMTV reports on the Establishment Losing Control and Rigging the Election.
Start your FREE 14-day trial!

Election Low Down & Censorship Of Podesta Wikileaks, FBI Quid Quo Pro & Hillary Staging Violence

Published on Oct 18, 2016

In this video Luke Rudkowski just goes over 3 of the latest Hillary Clinton scandals that just broke. We go over the Wikileaks Podesta Emails, James O'keefe Project Veritas video and the FBI release of 100 documents relating to Hillary Clinton's email investigation. Important election news showing the complicity of Comey and bias against Trump. Don't forget to invest in us and support independent media through


View post on

Support WeAreChange by Subscribing to our channel HERE

Visit our main site for more breaking news

Micro Doc: New World Order Truth: “Do People Really Not Understand That Our Nation Has Been Under Attack?”

Mac Slavo
October 16th, 2016

A new micro-documentary from SGT Report exposes the New World Order and its modern day figureheads.

Would you have the courage it would take to look the New World Order in the face – the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Bushes, the Clintons – and tell them exactly what you think of them?

That’s exactly what happened at the Sunday night debate. You can say what you want about Donald Trump but one thing is absolutely certain… the man has courage… I don’t think the significance in the exchange with Hillary Clinton can be overstated… The statements of fact that Trump shared are statements of fact that millions of Americans want to say to Hillary’s face…

But Trump is the one that said them on a global stage… You have to realize that Bill and Hillary Clinton are members of a global cartel… an international banking criminal syndicate… and standing up to them and speaking truth to them on a global stage is a moment of historical significance.